<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out of the Box Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13275</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13275</guid>
		<description>And before anyone else comments, replace &quot;Hong Kong&quot; with &quot;Beijing&quot; or any other major Chinese city. Yeah yeah, I forgot about &quot;one country, two systems&quot; or whatever the agreement is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And before anyone else comments, replace &#8220;Hong Kong&#8221; with &#8220;Beijing&#8221; or any other major Chinese city. Yeah yeah, I forgot about &#8220;one country, two systems&#8221; or whatever the agreement is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13274</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13274</guid>
		<description>China is not flourishing as an industrial country because of their population, but their labor laws, or should I say lack thereof. You can manufacture goods there extra cheap, that&#039;s why everything is built in China. That&#039;s also why the constantly de-value their currency. Their large population has made them an obvious market to sell goods in, but definitely not to manufacture goods in. More people? Really Ted? With natural resources dwindling and pollution at record highs, more people is just about the last thing we want on this planet. Less people is what we need.

Also, I don&#039;t get your line about communist counties having a better economy than us. Which countries? China? All of those shots of Hong Kong and Shanghai, with their big skyscrapers and fancy cars, is a small percentage of the country. Most lower class Americans would be middle class in China. America&#039;s per capita GDP PPP is 45,725, 6th in the world according to the IMF. China? 5,325, 100th in the world. Yeah, they&#039;re the gold standard...and I&#039;m better at hockey than Ovechkin.

For someone who likes to say people are &quot;out of touch,&quot; I&#039;m surprised at some of the things on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is not flourishing as an industrial country because of their population, but their labor laws, or should I say lack thereof. You can manufacture goods there extra cheap, that&#8217;s why everything is built in China. That&#8217;s also why the constantly de-value their currency. Their large population has made them an obvious market to sell goods in, but definitely not to manufacture goods in. More people? Really Ted? With natural resources dwindling and pollution at record highs, more people is just about the last thing we want on this planet. Less people is what we need.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t get your line about communist counties having a better economy than us. Which countries? China? All of those shots of Hong Kong and Shanghai, with their big skyscrapers and fancy cars, is a small percentage of the country. Most lower class Americans would be middle class in China. America&#8217;s per capita GDP PPP is 45,725, 6th in the world according to the IMF. China? 5,325, 100th in the world. Yeah, they&#8217;re the gold standard&#8230;and I&#8217;m better at hockey than Ovechkin.</p>
<p>For someone who likes to say people are &#8220;out of touch,&#8221; I&#8217;m surprised at some of the things on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Ted Leonsis&#8217; Crazy Ideas, Revisited - John Andrews - johnon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13273</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Ted Leonsis&#8217; Crazy Ideas, Revisited - John Andrews - johnon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13273</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve reviewed Ted&#8217;s Crazy Ideas and frankly, I find Ted&#8217;s perspective quite odd. A curious combination of patriarchal [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve reviewed Ted&#8217;s Crazy Ideas and frankly, I find Ted&#8217;s perspective quite odd. A curious combination of patriarchal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Low-Tech Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Less Technology for the Military?!</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13272</link>
		<dc:creator>The Low-Tech Times &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Less Technology for the Military?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13272</guid>
		<description>[...] was surprised to read Washington Capitals owner/businessman Ted Leonsis&#8217;s idea of saving money by spending less on technology for the military.  He offered the idea in response [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was surprised to read Washington Capitals owner/businessman Ted Leonsis&#8217;s idea of saving money by spending less on technology for the military.  He offered the idea in response [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13271</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13271</guid>
		<description>Ted -

Here&#039;s one completely out of the box idea for your friend in the new admin:

Stop spending our money.

I know it&#039;s radical isn&#039;t it.  I mean who would&#039;ve thought that if you don&#039;t have the money don&#039;t spend it huh?

Who would&#039;ve thought that if federal spending went up over $1 trillion dollars in the last 8 years that spending more money like the new administration is going to do (probably 1 to 2 trillion dollars in ONE year) is going to do anything different but prove an incontrovertible fact:

Government does not create wealth - it only shuffles money around.

Unfortunately, the new administration in all their educated brilliance doesn&#039;t have the brain power to grasp this concept.

Oh well I guess more of the same for the next 4 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted -</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one completely out of the box idea for your friend in the new admin:</p>
<p>Stop spending our money.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s radical isn&#8217;t it.  I mean who would&#8217;ve thought that if you don&#8217;t have the money don&#8217;t spend it huh?</p>
<p>Who would&#8217;ve thought that if federal spending went up over $1 trillion dollars in the last 8 years that spending more money like the new administration is going to do (probably 1 to 2 trillion dollars in ONE year) is going to do anything different but prove an incontrovertible fact:</p>
<p>Government does not create wealth &#8211; it only shuffles money around.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the new administration in all their educated brilliance doesn&#8217;t have the brain power to grasp this concept.</p>
<p>Oh well I guess more of the same for the next 4 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13270</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13270</guid>
		<description>Ted, I hate to say this but I think you are insane!
1.retirement age of 70- not a &quot;crazy&quot; idea, not even a new idea. in fact, a lot of people are working past 65 because they need to these days.
2.Medicare for the eldery removed- ummm, there is no way around this, you sound like a eugenic Nazzi. Why not just have the elderly walk off a cliff at 84 so we can save some food and oxygen too.....
3. mandatory service - not crazy or new. I think JFK brought this up a while ago, and there are quite a lot of people doing this as we speak.
4. why let the 84 year olds bear all the burden of Medicare and let the poor cash in? I say we lump them all together in your idea #2
5. so now the govmnt is telling me how much I should save and when I can down that? sounds like social security to me - been done.
6. Ummm- there u go again! most technology advances used in the civilian markets come from the military. take this crazy Internet thing younuse to make money on a daily. nuff said.

------ will continue this when I get off the bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, I hate to say this but I think you are insane!<br />
1.retirement age of 70- not a &#8220;crazy&#8221; idea, not even a new idea. in fact, a lot of people are working past 65 because they need to these days.<br />
2.Medicare for the eldery removed- ummm, there is no way around this, you sound like a eugenic Nazzi. Why not just have the elderly walk off a cliff at 84 so we can save some food and oxygen too&#8230;..<br />
3. mandatory service &#8211; not crazy or new. I think JFK brought this up a while ago, and there are quite a lot of people doing this as we speak.<br />
4. why let the 84 year olds bear all the burden of Medicare and let the poor cash in? I say we lump them all together in your idea #2<br />
5. so now the govmnt is telling me how much I should save and when I can down that? sounds like social security to me &#8211; been done.<br />
6. Ummm- there u go again! most technology advances used in the civilian markets come from the military. take this crazy Internet thing younuse to make money on a daily. nuff said.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212; will continue this when I get off the bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13269</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13269</guid>
		<description>1. Develop a large-scale RAIL SYSTEM.  Replace buses with light rail.  Reduce the cost of cross-country semi-traffic by creating a transportation grid.  Install high-speed trains for cross-country passenger travel.

2. I agree with Steve on the workday, for the most part.  4 ten-hour days would greatly reduce the amount of driving, fuel, road use etc.  In addition, parents have more time to spend with their children.

3. Rather then denying the elderly healthcare, we should eliminate government sponsored abortion clinics. Our nation needs our population to grow.  Throughout history, a large percentage of pregnancies were unplanned. Part of the population deficiency is that abortion eliminates these children from our system.

4. Cater to math, science and foreign language at a young age.  Put advanced students in advanced classes to eliminate boredom and make better use of their time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Develop a large-scale RAIL SYSTEM.  Replace buses with light rail.  Reduce the cost of cross-country semi-traffic by creating a transportation grid.  Install high-speed trains for cross-country passenger travel.</p>
<p>2. I agree with Steve on the workday, for the most part.  4 ten-hour days would greatly reduce the amount of driving, fuel, road use etc.  In addition, parents have more time to spend with their children.</p>
<p>3. Rather then denying the elderly healthcare, we should eliminate government sponsored abortion clinics. Our nation needs our population to grow.  Throughout history, a large percentage of pregnancies were unplanned. Part of the population deficiency is that abortion eliminates these children from our system.</p>
<p>4. Cater to math, science and foreign language at a young age.  Put advanced students in advanced classes to eliminate boredom and make better use of their time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13268</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13268</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I screwed up and put &quot;less&quot; when I meant &quot;more&quot;...


8. should have read:
Hint, rehashing history isn’t thinking out of the box. No, we don’t need more people in this country. Automate the difference (to make up for less workers), it’s going to happen anyway.

Again while I could have spent more time in other sections I really just want to reverse less to more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I screwed up and put &#8220;less&#8221; when I meant &#8220;more&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>8. should have read:<br />
Hint, rehashing history isn’t thinking out of the box. No, we don’t need more people in this country. Automate the difference (to make up for less workers), it’s going to happen anyway.</p>
<p>Again while I could have spent more time in other sections I really just want to reverse less to more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chet</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13267</link>
		<dc:creator>chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13267</guid>
		<description>#7

Force them to pay us?  Ask them to pay us maybe...

I see some guy getting beat up on the street, hey, I&#039;ll help you if you give me $5, otherwise forget it.

Whether you agree with the war or not, you don&#039;t ask the people you are liberating/invading to foot the bill.  It might sound good on paper (as many of these do), but your customer service is horrible and rightly so.

As for out-of-the-box thinking, I like Rep. Louie Gohmert&#039;s (R-Texas) idea to cut taxes for 2 months (individual and corporate).  Be a lot better than just giving them money (bailout).  Of course everyone will say it&#039;s just a tax cut for the rich...well, yeah, they (you) pay &#039;em.

#6
Goes with a few others, like cutting off old people from Medicare.  Retirement at 70.  Real out-of-the-box thinking would be to treat the symptom...Social Security.  Get rid of it.  Personal bank accounts.  How about Galveston, TX:  http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba514/

Less Technology for the Military, what?

I understand the point about making it more difficult for those in power to decide to go to war, but again, you&#039;re treating the symptom.  Those that decide will still decide to go regardless of the technology.  Only thing that would hurt are the seamen, soldiers and marines.

I like thinking out-of-the-box, but I think you can come up with much better ideas.

With Much Respect,
chet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7</p>
<p>Force them to pay us?  Ask them to pay us maybe&#8230;</p>
<p>I see some guy getting beat up on the street, hey, I&#8217;ll help you if you give me $5, otherwise forget it.</p>
<p>Whether you agree with the war or not, you don&#8217;t ask the people you are liberating/invading to foot the bill.  It might sound good on paper (as many of these do), but your customer service is horrible and rightly so.</p>
<p>As for out-of-the-box thinking, I like Rep. Louie Gohmert&#8217;s (R-Texas) idea to cut taxes for 2 months (individual and corporate).  Be a lot better than just giving them money (bailout).  Of course everyone will say it&#8217;s just a tax cut for the rich&#8230;well, yeah, they (you) pay &#8216;em.</p>
<p>#6<br />
Goes with a few others, like cutting off old people from Medicare.  Retirement at 70.  Real out-of-the-box thinking would be to treat the symptom&#8230;Social Security.  Get rid of it.  Personal bank accounts.  How about Galveston, TX:  <a href="http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba514/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba514/</a></p>
<p>Less Technology for the Military, what?</p>
<p>I understand the point about making it more difficult for those in power to decide to go to war, but again, you&#8217;re treating the symptom.  Those that decide will still decide to go regardless of the technology.  Only thing that would hurt are the seamen, soldiers and marines.</p>
<p>I like thinking out-of-the-box, but I think you can come up with much better ideas.</p>
<p>With Much Respect,<br />
chet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dori</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2008/12/01/out-of-the-box-thinking/#comment-13266</link>
		<dc:creator>Dori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=3156#comment-13266</guid>
		<description>#1 seems inevitable. Can&#039;t keep extending life expectancies and think retirement age isn&#039;t going to need to change.

#2 is misguided, to me. On Thanksgiving, my mother, who has worked in healthcare for her entire 40+ year career, was telling us that it cost nearly $8K for my stepfather&#039;s recent 2-hr stress test. She only found out when they got the bill from their insurance co for the balance and subsequently learned that Medicare paid 80% of this outlandish bill. Where is the oversight here? This is where we need focus our energies. Not on some random cut-off of benefits--which is frankly inhumane--but on having oversight committees to efficiently and effectively scrutinize and overhaul current Medicare practices along with wasteful, illogical and harmful practices of all the rest of our dysfunctional healthcare system. 

To #9, I would also add the farming/agriculture industry. We&#039;re finally coming around to understanding that just because you can buy apples cheaper from China, doesn&#039;t mean that the ultimate cost of doing so isn&#039;t higher for us in the end, once you add fuel and the price of putting our farmers out of business (not to mention good taste!). I&#039;m not a big believer in subsidies, but we must, as a nation, support those who study and learn agriculture and develop new technology that enables us to grow better and more efficiently. We need to produce more that other countries want to buy, and we mustn&#039;t make it impossible for small farmers to coexist along with the big ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 seems inevitable. Can&#8217;t keep extending life expectancies and think retirement age isn&#8217;t going to need to change.</p>
<p>#2 is misguided, to me. On Thanksgiving, my mother, who has worked in healthcare for her entire 40+ year career, was telling us that it cost nearly $8K for my stepfather&#8217;s recent 2-hr stress test. She only found out when they got the bill from their insurance co for the balance and subsequently learned that Medicare paid 80% of this outlandish bill. Where is the oversight here? This is where we need focus our energies. Not on some random cut-off of benefits&#8211;which is frankly inhumane&#8211;but on having oversight committees to efficiently and effectively scrutinize and overhaul current Medicare practices along with wasteful, illogical and harmful practices of all the rest of our dysfunctional healthcare system. </p>
<p>To #9, I would also add the farming/agriculture industry. We&#8217;re finally coming around to understanding that just because you can buy apples cheaper from China, doesn&#8217;t mean that the ultimate cost of doing so isn&#8217;t higher for us in the end, once you add fuel and the price of putting our farmers out of business (not to mention good taste!). I&#8217;m not a big believer in subsidies, but we must, as a nation, support those who study and learn agriculture and develop new technology that enables us to grow better and more efficiently. We need to produce more that other countries want to buy, and we mustn&#8217;t make it impossible for small farmers to coexist along with the big ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

