<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox is 5 Years Old This week - Thank You AOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/10/firefox-is-5-years-old-this-week-thank-you-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/10/firefox-is-5-years-old-this-week-thank-you-aol/</link>
	<description>The Blogging Site of Ted Leonsis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doc Izzzy</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/10/firefox-is-5-years-old-this-week-thank-you-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-36072</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Izzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=5455#comment-36072</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Mozilla/Firefox for supporting the Mac platform for so long, too. 

Ted: I always felt that in it's prime AOL could have taken down the Windows monopoly. I thought if you could have turned the popular &amp; familiar AOL online GUI into an OS, it would have been installed ion most of the subscribers' machines - especially because with them as subscribers you could make the AOL OS free with a commitment to subscribe. I always thought to the end user, the AOL GUI was practically an OS in that once they were logged in they almost never left the AOL software. Was that ever considered?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Mozilla/Firefox for supporting the Mac platform for so long, too. </p>
<p>Ted: I always felt that in it&#8217;s prime AOL could have taken down the Windows monopoly. I thought if you could have turned the popular &amp; familiar AOL online GUI into an OS, it would have been installed ion most of the subscribers&#8217; machines - especially because with them as subscribers you could make the AOL OS free with a commitment to subscribe. I always thought to the end user, the AOL GUI was practically an OS in that once they were logged in they almost never left the AOL software. Was that ever considered?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/10/firefox-is-5-years-old-this-week-thank-you-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-36071</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=5455#comment-36071</guid>
		<description>what do you shareholders think about $4 billion loss ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do you shareholders think about $4 billion loss ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
