<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You Matt and Here We Go Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/20/thank-you-matt-and-here-we-go-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/20/thank-you-matt-and-here-we-go-again/</link>
	<description>The Blogging Site of Ted Leonsis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bman21212</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/20/thank-you-matt-and-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-36333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bman21212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=5546#comment-36333</guid>
		<description>@Tom Moran, relax man.  Nylander gets paid the same no matter what he does, where he plays or doesn't.  Even you admitted he clearly "doesn't fit into the organizations style of play", and thus is not playing.  Bruce has a more up down style of play than Nylander dues.

He wants to play of the Washington Capitals, but they don't want him. Thus he is deciding if he wants to continue to wait in the press box (unlikely) or play somewhere on a loan (KHL most likely). How is that being treated unfair? 

Nylander went through waivers.  Now he is deciding if he wants to play in the KHL. It is unlikely that any NHL team will want him this season because of the 4.5 Million cap hit.  If he was only 2, he would probably be playing right now, but that's life in the cap regulated NHL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom Moran, relax man.  Nylander gets paid the same no matter what he does, where he plays or doesn&#8217;t.  Even you admitted he clearly &#8220;doesn&#8217;t fit into the organizations style of play&#8221;, and thus is not playing.  Bruce has a more up down style of play than Nylander dues.</p>
<p>He wants to play of the Washington Capitals, but they don&#8217;t want him. Thus he is deciding if he wants to continue to wait in the press box (unlikely) or play somewhere on a loan (KHL most likely). How is that being treated unfair? </p>
<p>Nylander went through waivers.  Now he is deciding if he wants to play in the KHL. It is unlikely that any NHL team will want him this season because of the 4.5 Million cap hit.  If he was only 2, he would probably be playing right now, but that&#8217;s life in the cap regulated NHL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/20/thank-you-matt-and-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-36332</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=5546#comment-36332</guid>
		<description>If Nylander had an undervalued contract and was running away from the field in the stats department, there is a point where the contract would be insulting if the organization refused to make any adjustments. And the fans would be on Nylander's side.

It's not that the Caps don't like or appreciate the man, things have played out and Nylander is no longer in the plan. They're not asking him to take a pay cut for not playing, they're asking him to show he has decent character and find somewhere that can use him in a reasonable amount of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Nylander had an undervalued contract and was running away from the field in the stats department, there is a point where the contract would be insulting if the organization refused to make any adjustments. And the fans would be on Nylander&#8217;s side.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that the Caps don&#8217;t like or appreciate the man, things have played out and Nylander is no longer in the plan. They&#8217;re not asking him to take a pay cut for not playing, they&#8217;re asking him to show he has decent character and find somewhere that can use him in a reasonable amount of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Brooklyn</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/20/thank-you-matt-and-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-36312</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Brooklyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=5546#comment-36312</guid>
		<description>Teddy, I like that saying "Matt Bradley week".  When I saw Matt Bradley get back on the ice I was kind of surprised!  But when I saw him coming down the ice with puck and stick weaving in and out, I knew that was a goal and a precise goal at that.  How sweet it was!  And welcome back Ovie!  Great Game!  Rock the Red. Lets Go Caps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teddy, I like that saying &#8220;Matt Bradley week&#8221;.  When I saw Matt Bradley get back on the ice I was kind of surprised!  But when I saw him coming down the ice with puck and stick weaving in and out, I knew that was a goal and a precise goal at that.  How sweet it was!  And welcome back Ovie!  Great Game!  Rock the Red. Lets Go Caps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Moran</title>
		<link>http://www.tedstake.com/2009/11/20/thank-you-matt-and-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-36285</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tedstake.com/?p=5546#comment-36285</guid>
		<description>"Michael Nylander is deciding where he wants to play"

Maybe I am misinterpreting this, but i take offense to the way you wrote this.

Michael Nylander has been nothing but professional since he has been a member of your organization. In my opinion the organization has not treated him fairly at all. He doesn't fit into the organizations style of play and long term plans..i get that, but the guy has a contract and an NMC that your GM gave to him. So he is not "deciding where he wants to play". He wants to play for the washington capitals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Michael Nylander is deciding where he wants to play&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe I am misinterpreting this, but i take offense to the way you wrote this.</p>
<p>Michael Nylander has been nothing but professional since he has been a member of your organization. In my opinion the organization has not treated him fairly at all. He doesn&#8217;t fit into the organizations style of play and long term plans..i get that, but the guy has a contract and an NMC that your GM gave to him. So he is not &#8220;deciding where he wants to play&#8221;. He wants to play for the washington capitals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
